非常兴奋的看到了之前期待的变换约束功能，在4.3改进了！我毫不犹豫的玩了起来。
期间又发现了一些小建议，希望在往后的版本带来改进。
当使用变换约束制作旋钮或者滑块的时候，被控制端提供了数值限位功能，这非常人性化，但控制端目前似乎仍能够自由活动。这会出现一些小问题，例如当我把旋钮旋转值超过限位很多圈之后，在不手动输入数值的情况下，需要回转同样的圈数才能回到有效值。或者类似制作面部控制器的时候，控制端作为滑块使用，在不做约束的情况下，控制骨们会变得稍显零乱。
需求：希望变换约束内提供一个选项，能让控制骨限定在数值区域内。或者单独提供一种功能，可以使骨骼的各项变换参数限定在设定值内。
另外，如果能通过变换约束，映射spine内的其他属性，例如骨骼移动控制ik权重、重力大小等，这样或许可以实现更复杂更有趣的效果。
还有一个强迫症的小问题，就是时间轴在以6帧显示时，每一格的显示似乎错位了
这些就是我在使用4.3beta时遇到的几个问题，感谢~
YYAYY Thank you very much for your detailed feedback, which clearly explains the use cases.
Currently, we are prioritizing bug fixes and runtime updates for the release of a stable version of 4.3-beta with the current functionality, but we will certainly consider the points you raised for future improvements.
I would like to confirm your opinion specifically regarding the frame markers on the timeline.
It’s understandable that the current display may feel slightly off, as there appears to be a subtle misalignment. However, I believe there are two possible directions for improvement:
When numbers are displayed every 6 frames, do you think it would be better to show 3 intermediate lines instead of 4, so that the timeline bar and the grid lines align every 2 frames?
Or would it be preferable to display 5 intermediate lines, so that the timeline bar and the lines align every single frame?
When numbers are displayed every 5 frames, having 4 intermediate lines results in a consistent alignment every 1 frame.
Similarly, when numbers are displayed every 10 frames, 4 intermediate lines allow for alignment every 2 frames.
Since the 6-frame interval falls between these two patterns, adjusting the number of intermediate lines—whether increasing or decreasing—results in different behavior compared to the 5-frame and 10-frame cases, which may make the logic a bit more complex.
Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Misaki 感谢misaki的用心回复，期待看到未来更强大的spine！
关于时间轴的问题，这也让我纠结了很久。在以6帧为显示时，我原本更倾向使用类似5帧的逻辑（逐帧显示）
，因为他们更接近，而且按我自己以往的制作习惯，不自觉的会去找5的倍数K关键帧。但是如果以10帧的方式显示（间隔显示）
，画面会更加清爽。所以，如果以目前的逻辑，不进行大调整的话，间隔显示或许是更合适的选择。
写到这里，又引申出了新的问题。如果使用者的习惯不同（习惯以5、10、15、20的倍数制作，或者习惯6、12、18、30）在两种单位间隔的切换中似乎容易产生混乱。如果之后的规划允许，能否在“设置”里添加一个“”单位切换“”的选项，使时间轴伸缩的过程中，始终保持以5倍或者6倍为单独的转换单位。
YYAYY Sorry for the late reply! After consulting with the Spine team, we have decided that it would be better to gather more opinions on this matter before making a decision. For now, we will continue to prioritize the release of the stable version, but if there are many comments, we will reconsider.
Thank you again for your feedback!
